ORALS
SESSION: AdvancedMaterialsTuePM1-R6
| 4th Intl. Symp. on New and Advanced Materials and Technologies for Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development |
| Tue Nov, 6 2018 / Room: Guaratiba (60/2nd) | |
| Session Chairs: Barbara Szpunar; Jerry Bernholc; Session Monitor: TBA |
14:50: [AdvancedMaterialsTuePM107]
The Importance of Polymer Topology in Surface Absorption Giuseppe
Pellicane1 ; Mesfin
Tsige
2 ; Francis
Gaitho
1 ;
1University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;
2University of Akron, Akron, United States;
Paper Id: 282
[Abstract] Physical techniques for surface modification of plastics use surface-active agents, which are allowed to self-assemble at the surface. Many techniques, which are important in modern technologies, use polymer blends, and there is considerable interest in understanding the composition extent of the surface layer differs from that in the bulk for molten polymer mixtures. Dynamical and structural properties of polymers in the melt state are strongly influenced by molecular architecture [1-4] and blending polymers with different molecular topologies could be potentially exploited to control interfacial segregation of the polymer film, and to achieve optimal mechanical properties of the plastic material [5,6]. However, a deep understanding of the role of chain architecture and molecular mass in determining which species preferentially adsorb at a given interface is lacking. Experiments to resolve the matter are typically conducted by mixing polymers possessing the same repeat chemistry, but different molecular architecture [10-14]. Here we show the results obtained in large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of linear-cyclic polymer films, and we find clear evidence of enhancement of linear polymers at the interface [7], in agreement with recent experimental results [8]. The behavior predicted by the self-consistent field theory (SCF), i.e., enhancement of cyclic polymers at the interface [9], emerges for relatively long chains. In our presentation, we provide a picture of the microscopic mechanisms through which the chain length arbitrates the competition between the different packing constraints imposed by the loop and linear geometry of the two polymers. We also discuss the role of enthalpic and entropic factors of the interfacial free energy of the system in determining which species in the blend preferentially adsorbs at the interface.
References:
[1] Kapnistos, M; Lang. M; Rubinstein, M; Roovers, J.; Chang, T; Vlassopoulos, D., Soc. Rheol. Annu. Meeting 2006.
[2] Robertson, R. M.; Smith, D. E., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 4824-4827.
[3] Iyer, B. V. S.; Lele, A. K.; Shanbhag, S., Macromolecules 2007, 40, 5995.
[4] Subramanian, G.; Shanbhag S., Macromolecules 2008, 41, 7239-7242.
[5] Wu, S. L.; Polymer Interface and Adhesion, Marcel Dekker: New York, 1982.
[6] Garbassi, F; Morra, M; Occhiello, E., Polymer Surfaces: From Physics to Technology; John Wiley and Sons: New York,1994.
[7] G. Pellicane, M. Megnidio-Tchoukouegno, G. T. Mola, and M. Tsige, Physical Review E Rapid Communications, 93, 050501 (2016); M. Megnidio-Tchoukouegno, F. M. Gaitho, G. T. Mola, M. Tsige, and G. Pellicane, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 441, 33-42 (2017); F. M. Gaitho, M. Tsige, G. T. Mola, and G. Pellicane, Polymers, 10, 324 (2018).
[8] Wang, S-F; Li, X.; Agapov, R. L.; Wesdemiotis, C.; Foster, M. D., ACS Macro Letters, 2012, 1, 1024-1027. (2016).
[9] Wu , D. T.; Fredrickson, G. H., Macromolecules 1996, 29, 7919-7930.
