2024 - Sustainable Industrial Processing Summit
SIPS 2024 Volume 10. Ross Intl. Symp / Geochemistry

Editors:F. Kongoli, M. Alvaro, G. Artioli, M. Asta, S. Hayun, A. Navrotsky, R. Riedel, S. Webb
Publisher:Flogen Star OUTREACH
Publication Year:2024
Pages:170 pages
ISBN:978-1-998384-22-8 (CD)
ISSN:2291-1227 (Metals and Materials Processing in a Clean Environment Series)
CD-SIPS2024_Volume1
CD shopping page

    SURFACE ENERGY OF AMORPHOUS ENSTATITE AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE FORMATION OF SILICATE CLOUDS IN HOT JUPITER ATMOSPHERES

    Megan Householder1; James Lyons2; Tamilarasan Subramani1; Kristina Lilova1; Alexandra Navrotsky3;
    1ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, Tempe, United States; 2PLANETARY SCIENCES INSTITUTE, Tucson, United States; 3ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, Phoenix, United States;
    Type of Paper: Regular
    Id Paper: 144
    Topic: 67

    Abstract:

    Planets that orbit stars other than our sun are called exoplanets and over 5,500 have been confirmed in our galaxy. Hot Jupiters are a type of exoplanet that orbit very close to their star and are tidally locked, with a permanent daytime and nighttime side. Being the hottest exoplanets, they emit the most radiation and thus are a prime target for the James Webb Space Telescope. Silicates are a ubiquitous feature of aerosols on hot giant exoplanets. [1] WASP 17-b is a hot Jupiter with an orbital period of 3.7 days whose atmosphere was recently observed by James Webb Space Telescope to be dominated by quartz (SiO2) nanocrystals, although magnesium-rich silicates were expected to be seen. [2] In the brown dwarf VHS 1256-1257b, the best fit models for spectroscopic observations were clouds of enstatite (MgSiO3), forsterite (Mg2SiO4), and quartz. [3] Despite key silicate features in spectroscopy, it is not possible to determine complete atmospheric composition and cloud formation by astronomical observations alone, and particle formation in atmospheres must be modeled. Major factors in modeling atmospheres are nucleation and condensation, which are exponentially dependent on the species’ surface energy, with higher surface energies drastically hindering nucleation rates. Although the need for  reliable  surface energy measurements is evident, surface energies of several key species in hot giant exoplanets are not yet constrained by experiment. In this work, surface energies of likely exoplanet atmosphere condensates, including zinc sulfide (ZnS), crystalline, and amorphous enstatite were measured using oxide melt solution calorimetry of appropriate nanoparticles. These are then input into a nucleation code that gives nucleation rates for these species. [4,5] The surface energy of crystalline SiO2 is much lower than that of the crystalline magnesium-rich silicates, supporting the observation of silica in the atmosphere of WASP-17b, while the surface energy of amorphous enstatite is similar to that of quartz. [4,6] This suggests that initial nucleation of MgSiO3 in VHS 1256-1257b could form the amorphous phase. This research provides experimental surface energy data of high relevance to a broad range of exoplanet atmospheres.

    Keywords:

    Surface energy; Nucleation; Silicates; Exoplanets; Calorimetry; Nanoparticles

    Cite this article as:

    Householder M, Lyons J, Subramani T, Lilova K, Navrotsky A. (2024). SURFACE ENERGY OF AMORPHOUS ENSTATITE AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE FORMATION OF SILICATE CLOUDS IN HOT JUPITER ATMOSPHERES. In F. Kongoli, M. Alvaro, G. Artioli, M. Asta, S. Hayun, A. Navrotsky, R. Riedel, S. Webb (Eds.), Sustainable Industrial Processing Summit Volume 10 Ross Intl. Symp / Geochemistry (pp. 139-140). Montreal, Canada: FLOGEN Star Outreach