2017-Sustainable Industrial Processing Summit
SIPS 2017 Volume 5. Marquis Intl. Symp. / New and Advanced Materials and Technologies
| Editors: | Kongoli F, Marquis F, Chikhradze N |
| Publisher: | Flogen Star OUTREACH |
| Publication Year: | 2017 |
| Pages: | 590 pages |
| ISBN: | 978-1-987820-69-0 |
| ISSN: | 2291-1227 (Metals and Materials Processing in a Clean Environment Series) |
CD shopping page
Dynamic Impact Factor During Test of Cylindrical Shape Sample Under Shock Load
Levan Japaridze1; Nikoloz Chikhradze2; Fernand Marquis3;1LEPL GRIGOL TSULUKIDZE MINING INSTITUTE, Tbilisi, Georgia; 2LEPL GRIGOL TSULUKIDZE MINING INSTITUTE/GEORGIAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, Tbilisi, Georgia; 3SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, San Diego, United States;
Type of Paper: Regular
Id Paper: 66
Topic: 43
Abstract:
The fundamentals challenges of shock loading impact are known as complex nonlinear problems with variable contact conditions. Even the simplified solution of these problems often bring in essential mathematical complexity. Therefore, and in practice we often use simplified analytical approaches to resolve engineering challenges even in not so sophisticated conditions. It is demonstrated that the static and dynamic contact forces in the interaction of solid bodies are reciprocally proportional and therefore it is possible to calculate the structure under impact loads using static methods and then the external forces, internal stresses and deformations, determined in such a way, are multiplied by the appropriate dynamic impact factor (DIF) for adequate model calculations. This is important for the design and applications in Defense, where the parameters of assessment of the impact resistance of solid materials and structural elements are understood as the ratio of the maximum dynamic to average static load. However, the DIF is taken by some authors also as ratio of the dynamic to static strength of the material and are often reported as a function of the strain rate. The tensile as well as shear strength are key material parameters in the analysis of structures under these conditions. They are generally determined using either a direct tensile test or an indirect splitting tensile test setup. Both tests are simple in concept, but have proven quite complicated to run in such a way that reliable results, independent of specimen and platens size, shapes, and boundary conditions, are often difficult to obtain. The indirect tensile testing method, known as the Brazilian Test, developed by Carneiro and Barcellos, has found widespread application because of its practical convenience for determining the static and dynamic tensile strength of materials. The Brazilian test has been reviewed and investigated by numerous scientists. However ever since the development of this method scientists have been interested in answering questions such as: why and when samples are not split along the loading diameter, as to the basic idea of the Brazilian test, but at some distance away from it; and how and why does the Brazilian test overestimate the tensile strength of these materials? In this paper we suggest formulas for the dynamic impact factor for Cylindrical Specimen applying the Standard Test Method for Splitting Strength of samples on the drop hammer facility and using the Split Hopkinson Pressure bar. The DIF for the application of dynamic compressive tests under impact load, using a hammer falling on the steel ball placed at the center of the top surface of cylindrical specimen are also considered. The DIF here is understood as the ratio of maximum dynamic load, internal stress and displacement from falling body related to the static load, stress and deformation, caused by the action of the weight of this body. The fundamental static challenges are solved by appling elasticity theory methods, and the analytical solutions are compared to the results of numerical modeling, conducted by "Rocksciense" under the Fase 2 program. These results show adequate agreement.
Keywords:
New and advanced materials; New and advanced technology;References:
[1] Measurement of Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete. ACI 544.2R-89 (Reapproved 1999).[2] Fei Yang, Hongwei Ma, Lin Jing, Longmao Zhao and Zhihua Wang: Dynamic compressive and splitting tensile tests on mortar using split Hopkinson pressure bar technique, Lat. Am. j. solids struct., vol.12, no.4, Rio de Janeiro, Aug. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-78251513.
[3] F. Carneiro and A. Barcellos, International association of testing and research laboratories for materials and structures, RILEM Bull, 1953, 13:99–125.
[4] ISRM Suggested Methods, Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring in Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981, 119-121.
[5] ASTM C1144-89, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength for Brittle Nuclear Waste Forms, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1989.
[6] ASTM D 3967-08: Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA, 2008.
[7] BS EN 12390-6:2000. British Standard. Testing hardened concrete. Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens.
[8] Feng Dai et al: Some Fundamental Issues in Dynamic Compression and Tension Tests of Rocks Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, November 2010, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225550739.
a. M. Weidner et al: Drop Hammer Test of Concrete Cylinders considering Fiber reinforcement and Elevated Temperature, US Idaho National Laboratory, October 2012, http://www.inl.gov.
[9] Martina Scapin, Lorenzo Peroni and Massimiliano Avalle: Dynamic Brazilian Test for Mechanical Characterization of Ceramic Ballistic Protection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Shock and Vibration, Volume 2017, Article ID 7485856, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7485856.
[10] Sia Nemat-Nasser, L.B. Isaacs and J.E. Starrett: Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Volume 435, Issue 1894 (Nov.8,1991), 371-391.
[11] W. C. Zhu, L. L. Niu, S. H. Li, Z. H. Xu: Dynamic Brazilian Test of Rock Under Intermediate Strain Rate: Pendulum Hammer-Driven SHPB Test and Numerical Simulation, Rock Mech Rock Eng (2015), 48:1867–1881.
[12] L. A. Japaridze: Tensile testing of cylindrical specimens by the cleavage method, Journal of Mining Science, Springer International Publishing AG, Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June, 1972, 331-334, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02505722.
[13] Ye Jianhong, F.Q. Wu and J.Z. Sun: Estimation of the tensile elastic modulus using Brazilian disc by applying diametrically opposed concentrated loads, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 46 (2009), 568–576.
[14] Li DY, Wong LNY. The Brazilian disc test for rock mechanics applications: review and new insights. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 2013; 46(2): 269-87.
[15] G.M urali et.al: Impact Resistance and Strength Reliability of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Using Two Parameter Weibull Distribution, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, no. 4, April 2014.
[16] L.A. Japaridze: Shear Stresses in the Indirect Test of Tensile Strength of Rocks and Other Hard Materials, Bulletin of Georgia National Academy of Sciences, vol. 10, 3 (2016).
[17] S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier. Theory of Elasticity, 1970, 3rd ed., McGr aw-Hill, New York.
[18] M. Mellor and I. Hawkes: Measurement of tensile strength by diametral compression of discs and annuli, Eng. Geol., 5 (1971), 173-225.
[19] JK Daemen, LM Ma, and GH Zhao. Long-term mechanical behavior of Yucca Mountain Tuff and its variability, Final Technical Report for Task ORD-FY04e021, Reno, USA, Department of Mining Engineering, University of Nevada, 2006, http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/yucca mtn_pubs/17.
[20] N.I. Muskhelishvili. Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, 4th ed., Noordhoff, Groningen, 1963.
[21] L.A. Japaridze: Stress-deformed state of cylindrical specimens during indirect tensile strength testing, J. Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 7 (5): 509–518.
[22] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775515000815
[23] Q.Z. Wang, W.Li and X.L.Song: A Method for Testing Dynamic Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus of Rock Materials Using SHPB, Pure appl. Geophys, 163 (2006), 1091–1100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225220917