Determination of Nanoscopic Parameters in Second Strain Gradient Elasticity
Farzaneh
Ojaghnezhad1; Hossein
Shodja2;
1, Karaj, Iran (Islamic Republic of Iran); 2SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic of Iran);
Type of Paper: Regular
Id Paper: 434
Topic: 1Abstract:
Mindlin's second strain gradient theory, due to its competency in capturing the surface effects, is of particular interest. For a homogeneous, centrosymmetric and isotropic material, formulation in this framework introduces sixteen additional constants. Fifteen parameters bring up four characteristic lengths associated with bulk and another one associated with surface. Bulk characteristic lengths and Lame constants appear in equilibrium equations, while surface characteristic length enters the formulation through boundary conditions. The remaining parameter is modulus of cohesion characterizing the surface effect. To date, there are no successful experimentations measuring these internal length scales. Due to the lack of experimental and computational data, quantitative analyses based on these enriched theories have been impossible. The present work gives an accurate remedy for the calculation of these parameters by utilizing an analytical formulation in lattice dynamics combined with the first principles. From the equivalency between the atomistic crystal lattice dynamics of bulk and its counterpart in second strain gradient elasticity, bulk characteristic lengths are expressed in terms of atomic force constants. Additionally, considering a free standing film that brings the surface effect into account, analytical expressions for surface energy and change in film thickness are obtained in terms of modulus of cohesion, Lame constants, surface and bulk characteristic lengths and film thickness. The numerical values of atomic force constants, surface energy and change in film thickness are calculated using ab initio simulations and subsequently bulk and surface characteristic lengths and modulus of cohesion are evaluated from the developed analytical expressions.
Keywords:
Characterization; Crystal; Mechanics; Nanoscale; Surface;
References:
[1] R.D. Mindlin and N.N. Eshel: On first strain-gradient theories in linear elasticity, Int. J. Solids Struct., 4 (1968), 109-124
[2] R.D. Mindlin: Second gradient of strain and surface-tension in linear elasticity, Int. J. Solids Struct., 1(1965), 417-438
[3] H.M. Shodja and A. Tehranchi: A formulation for the characteristic lenghts of fcc materials in first strain gradient elasticity via the Sutton-Chen potential, Phil. Mag, 90 (2010), 1893-1913
[4] H.M. Shodja and A. Tehranchi: A formulation for the characteristic lenghts of fcc materials in first strain gradient elasticity via the Sutton-Chen potential, Corrigendum, Phil. Mag. 92 (2012), 1170-1171
[5] H.M. Shodja, F. Ahmadpoor and A. Tehranchi: Calculation of the additional constants for fcc materials in second strain gradient elasticity: Behavior of a nano-size Bernoulli-Euler beam with surface effects, J. Appl. Mech., 79 (2012), 021008-021015
[6] M.W. Finnis and J.E. Sinclair: A simple empirical N-body potential for transition metals, Phil. Mag., A. 50 (1984), 45-55
[7] F. Ojaghnezhad and H.M. Shodja: A combined first principles and analytical treatment for determination of the surface elastic constants: application to Si (001) ideal and reconstructed surfaces, Phil. Mag. Lett., 92 (2012), 7-19
[8] M.R. Delfani, H.M. Shodja and F. Ojaghnezhad: Mechanics and morphology of single-walled carbon nanotubes from graphene to elastic, Phil. Mag., 93 (17) (2013), 2057-2088
[9] F. Ojaghnezhad and H.M. Shodja: A combined first principles and analytical determination of the modulus of cohesion, surface energy, and the additional constants in the second strain gradient elasticity, Int. J. Solids Struct., 50 (2013), 3967-3974
[10] G. Kresse and J. Hafner: Ab-initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B., 47 (1993), 558-561
[11] G. Kresse and J. Hafner: Ab-initio molecular dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B., 49 (1994), 14251-14269
[12] G. Kresse and J. Furthmȕller: Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mat. Sci., 6 (1996), 15-50
[13] 13 G. Kresse and J. Furthmȕller: Efficient iterative schemes for ab-initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B., 54 (1996), 11169-11186
[14] P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn: Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev., 136 (1964), B864-B871
[15] W. Kohn and L. Sham: Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev., 140 (1965), A1133-A1138
[16] G. Kresse and J. Hafner: Norm-conserving and ultrasoft pseudopotentials for first-row and transition elements. J. Phys.: Condens. Matt., 6 (1994), 8245-8257
[17] H. Monkhorst and J. Pack: Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B., 13 (1976), 5188-5192
[18] J.P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G.I., Csonka, O.A. Vydrov, G.E. Scuseria, L.A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, K.: Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (2008), 136406-136409
[19] LB Freund and S Suresh. THIN FILM MATERIALS, Stress, defect formation, and surface evolution, 2003, Cambridge university press, chapter 3.
[20] C. Fiolhais, L.M. Almeida, and C. Henriques: Extraction of aluminium surface energies from slab calculations: perturbative and non-perturbative approaches, Prog. Surf. Sci., 74 (2003), 209-217
[21] W.R. Tyson and W.A. Miller: Surface free energies of solid metals: estimation from liquid surface tension measurements, Surf. Sci., 62 (1977), 267-276Full Text:
Click here to access the Full TextCite this article as:
Ojaghnezhad F and Shodja H. Determination of Nanoscopic Parameters in Second Strain Gradient Elasticity. In: Kongoli F, Bordas S, Estrin Y, editors. Sustainable Industrial Processing Summit SIPS 2015 Volume 1: Aifantis Intl. Symp. / Multiscale Material Mechanics. Volume 1. Montreal(Canada): FLOGEN Star Outreach. 2015. p. 271-282.